翻訳と辞書 Words near each other ・ Oregon Trail Ruts (Guernsey, Wyoming) ・ Oregon Trail School District ・ Oregon Trail Scouts ・ Oregon Trail, Wells Springs Segment ・ Oregon Treaty ・ Oregon Trunk Passenger and Freight Station ・ Oregon Trunk Rail Bridge ・ Oregon University System ・ Oregon v. Bradshaw ・ Oregon v. Guzek ・ Oregon v. Ice ・ Oregon v. Mitchell ・ Oregon Vietnam Veterans Memorial ・ Oregon Volunteers ・ Oregon Vortex ・ Oregon Waste Systems, Inc. v. Department of Environmental Quality of Oregon ・ Oregon Water Resources Department ・ Oregon Water Tower and Pump House ・ Oregon Water Trust ・ Oregon Wild ・ Oregon wine ・ Oregon Wine Board ・ Oregon Wing Civil Air Patrol ・ Oregon Women of Achievement ・ Oregon Women's Political Caucus ・ Oregon World War II Army Airfields ・ Oregon Youth Authority ・ Oregon Youth Development Division ・ Oregon Zoo ・ Oregon's 1st congressional district Dictionary Lists mini英和辞書 mini和英辞書 Webster 1913 Latin-English FOLDOC Wikipedia English ウィキペディア

翻訳と辞書　辞書検索 [ 開発暫定版 ] スポンサード リンク Oregon Waste Systems, Inc. v. Department of Environmental Quality of Oregon ： ウィキペディア英語版 Oregon Waste Systems, Inc. v. Department of Environmental Quality of Oregon ''Oregon Waste Systems, Inc. v. Department of Environmental Quality of Oregon'', is a United States Supreme Court decision focused on the aspect of state power and the interpretation of the Commerce Clause as a limitation on states' regulatory power. In this particular case, the Supreme Court considered whether the Oregon Department of Environmental Quality's alleged cost-based surcharge on the disposal of out-of-state waste violated the dormant commerce clause.〔Stephens, Otis. ''American Constitutional Law Volume 1''. Thomson Wadsworth. USA, 2003〕 == Opinion of the Court == The Court voted 7–2 in favor of Oregon Waste Systems, holding that Oregon's surcharge was invalid under the negative commerce clause. This meant that the surcharge favored in-state economic interests over out-of-state counterparts. The surcharge was discriminatory to outside states because it imposed a fee three times greater than that imposed on in-state waste.〔Supreme Court Collection. Cornell University Law School. Legal Information Institute〕 In order for such a surcharge to be valid, it would have to be justified as compensatory, in that it makes out-of-state shippers pay their fair share of the disposal costs. This would have to be equivalent to a measurable standard that would be the same for in-state shipping. However, Oregon's surcharge of $2.25 for out-of-state waste compared with a surcharge of $0.85 on in-state waste was determined facially discriminatory. Citing a previous case, the Supreme Court indicated that such surcharges may be acceptable if they were based on increased costs specifically associated with out-of-state waste. 抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア（Wikipedia）』 ■ウィキペディアで「Oregon Waste Systems, Inc. v. Department of Environmental Quality of Oregon」の詳細全文を読む スポンサード リンク 翻訳と辞書 : 翻訳のためのインターネットリソース Copyright(C) kotoba.ne.jp 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved.